Post Keynesian and Ecological Economics
Show Less

Post Keynesian and Ecological Economics

Confronting Environmental Issues

Edited by Richard P.F. Holt, Steven Pressman and Clive L. Spash

It is argued that mainstream economics, with its present methodological approach, is limited in its ability to analyze and develop adequate public policy to deal with current environmental problems and sustainable development. This book provides an alternative approach. Building on the strengths and insights of Post Keynesian and ecological economics and incorporating cutting edge work in such areas as economic complexity, bounded rationality and socio-economic dynamics, the contributors to this book provide a trans-disciplinary approach to deal with a broad range of environmental concerns.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Challenges for Post Keynesian Growth Theory: Utopia Meets Environmental and Social Reality

Clive L. Spash and Heinz Schandl


Clive L. Spash and Heinz Schandl INTRODUCTION The methodological approach of Post Keynesian economics (PKE) has been explained by Paul Davidson (1981) as involving ‘historical and humanistic models’ which, while abstract, aim for descriptive realism. More specifically he regards three propositions as constitutive of PKE. First, the economy is a process in historical time. This emphasizes the time taken for production and consumption, that knowledge is asymmetric and incomplete with the past revealed and the future hidden, and that failing to account for time in economic models makes them irrelevant. Second, uncertainty and surprises are unavoidable which makes expectations central to understanding economic decisions. Uncertainty refers to ignorance of the future and should not then be equated with risk assessment of uncertain but knowable futures. Different people have different histories and experiences and so expectations. This inherent variety adds heterogeneity and plural perspectives to economic agents. Third, economic and political institutions play an important role in determining economic outcomes. Thus, PKE is concerned about the distribution of income as a basic struggle by individuals for control of their destinies and between various groups and social organizations. Each of these three elements can also be found in ecological economics.1 First, the importance of the economy’s historical path is revealed by analysis of energy and materials use over the last few hundred years and the related concept of industrial metabolism (Ayres and Simonis, 1994; Schandl and Krausmann, 2007; Schandl and Schulz, 2002). Second, concern has been expressed over the epistemology of ignorance...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.