Post Keynesian and Ecological Economics
Show Less

Post Keynesian and Ecological Economics

Confronting Environmental Issues

Edited by Richard P.F. Holt, Steven Pressman and Clive L. Spash

It is argued that mainstream economics, with its present methodological approach, is limited in its ability to analyze and develop adequate public policy to deal with current environmental problems and sustainable development. This book provides an alternative approach. Building on the strengths and insights of Post Keynesian and ecological economics and incorporating cutting edge work in such areas as economic complexity, bounded rationality and socio-economic dynamics, the contributors to this book provide a trans-disciplinary approach to deal with a broad range of environmental concerns.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: The Post Keynesian/Ecological Economics of Kenneth Boulding

Robert H. Scott


1 Robert H. Scott, III Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist. (Boulding, 1966, p. 3) INTRODUCTION On 8 March 1966 at the sixth Resources for the Future Forum on Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, Kenneth Boulding (1966) presented his now famous paper ‘The economics of the coming spaceship earth’. This paper, arguably, marks the beginning of modern ecological economics. In it, Boulding castigates neoclassical economists for ignoring the environment in their models. As Ehrun Kula (1998, p. 4) accurately states, Boulding’s paper ‘must be one of the most thought-provoking pieces written on the environment this century’. Robert Heilbroner (1975, p. 77) called it a ‘classic’. Its importance is mostly due to the fact that until this time mainstream economists were largely silent about how the economy impacts upon the environment (as well as how the environment impacts upon the economy). Boulding’s article made it clear that the environment is important, and also made it clear that economists could no longer ignore it in their analyses. In the 1970s, due to growing national interest in environmental issues (resulting in the first Earth Day and creation of the Environmental Protection Agency in the USA) mainstream neoclassical economists developed two subfields to study the environment: (1) environmental economics; and (2) natural resource economics. Today most mainstream economists use the term ‘environmental economics’ to encompass both subfields. Environmental economics studies the effects (or inclusions) of economic activity on the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.