International Governance and Law
Show Less

International Governance and Law

State Regulation and Non-state Law

Edited by Hanneke van Schooten and Jonathan Verschuuren

Around the world, the role of national regulation is often hotly debated. This book takes as its starting point the fact that legislatures and regulators are criticized for overregulation and for producing poor-quality regulation which ignores input from citizens and stifles private initiative. This situation has enhanced the role of non-state law, in forms such as self-regulation and soft law. In this book, international scholars in various fields of law, as well as socio-legal studies, address the question to what extent non-state law currently influences state regulation, and what the consequences of non-state law are likely to be for state regulation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: In a World Without a Sovereign: Native Title Law in Australia

Francesca Dominello


Francesca Dominello 1. INTRODUCTION In Mabo v Queensland (No. 2)1 the High Court of Australia held, by a sixmember majority, that the Meriam people, the recognized indigenous inhabitants of the Murray Islands, were entitled, as against the whole world, to possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of the lands of the Murray Islands.2 For the first time in Australian law a form of indigenous native title was found not only to exist, but also to have pre-dated and to have survived the acquisition of British sovereignty over the Australian territories. The Court’s formulation was grounded in the common law: the common law recognized that native title did exist; however, the content of native title would arise from the traditions and customs of the indigenous peoples themselves. In order to facilitate the common law recognition of native title, the Court first considered it necessary to reject the terra nullius doctrine as forming any part of Australian law.3 The Court found that the terra nullius doctrine had operated to deny any indigenous rights to land through the characterization of Australia at the time of first settlement as a land belonging to no one. This legal characterization had found support from a line of judicial pronouncements that had declared the continent to be in effect ‘desert and uncultivated’4 at the time of British settlement. Before Mabo indigenous customary law only had the status of what could be described as a form of non-state law. It had been generally accepted that indigenous peoples...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.