Governing Universities Globally
Show Less

Governing Universities Globally

Organizations, Regulation and Rankings

Roger King

The comprehensive coverage of global university governance includes conceptual, theoretical and empirical analyses that will be invaluable to higher education researchers and students, and to public policy academics, students and practitioners. Global governance analysts, global business and management postgraduates, as well as regulation theorists and practitioners will also find this book to be of great interest.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: World Models of University Governance

Roger King


INTRODUCTION Since the demise of Soviet communism and the Cold War at the end of the 1980s, a feature of new governance structures in state policymaking around the world in the context of global competition is the predominance of economic models and their influence within policy discourse (Hay 2004; Kay 2008). Notions of free trade, open markets, and well-trained and flexible employees are normalized as necessary for material prosperity and democratic governance (Peck 2001). A key assumption in such thinking is that markets are the most efficient allocator of resources across a range of domains, through the operation of the price mechanism particularly and its reflection of myriads of individual preferences for the supply of goods and services (in comparison particularly with failed welfare and socialist states that sought to allocate by bureaucratic administration). In this model public intervention is justified primarily (and minimally) to offset market failure in cases where public and private costs/rewards are out of alignment, where insufficient information for citizens obtains for rational decisionmaking to take place without further state-encouraged disclosures on matters such as product quality and performance, to supply huge public goods that are not produced by private markets alone, such as a system of national defence, and to break up monopolies and promote competition. As we shall see, universities also have become subject to such processes in their governing and regulatory arrangements. Such propositions form part of so-called public choice theory, which suggests that governments rather than markets create inefficiencies. That is, the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.