Governing Universities Globally
Show Less

Governing Universities Globally

Organizations, Regulation and Rankings

Roger King

The comprehensive coverage of global university governance includes conceptual, theoretical and empirical analyses that will be invaluable to higher education researchers and students, and to public policy academics, students and practitioners. Global governance analysts, global business and management postgraduates, as well as regulation theorists and practitioners will also find this book to be of great interest.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Global Regulatory Governance

Roger King


INTRODUCTION In the Introduction and in Chapters 1 and 2, we outlined some of the processes that underpinned the growth of transnational convergence in university governance, such as more autonomous models of organization, growing governmental and other notions of universities’ social relevancy, more market-like mechanisms, internationalization, policies of institutional differentiation, and notions of external and increasingly formalized regulation. As part of our account we pointed to a range of non-governmental and wider social processes underlying similarities in university models around the world, such as the remarkable global uniformity in the rise and fall of academic subjects in university provision, and the influence of world blueprints or ‘scripts’ in higher education policymaking. We also outlined explanations – cultural, economic and political – for these developments. These are drawn out a little more here before proceeding with a further analysis of regulatory governance. Utilizing the work of Gilardi (2008), and particularly Jordana and LeviFaur (2006), on the diffusion of specialized regulatory agencies around the world and across many policy sectors, we draw on their approaches to offer a distinction between three main explanatory approaches for global similarities in university governance. The assumption is that many of the common arrangements in higher education systems that have emerged are linked rather than separate phenomena. THREE THEORIES One theory we may offer for convergence in transnational university governance is that of economic competition, and it runs as follows. The state’s dependency on successful forms of advanced capitalism, and its belief that universities are critical instruments for achieving...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.