Governing Universities Globally
Show Less

Governing Universities Globally

Organizations, Regulation and Rankings

Roger King

The comprehensive coverage of global university governance includes conceptual, theoretical and empirical analyses that will be invaluable to higher education researchers and students, and to public policy academics, students and practitioners. Global governance analysts, global business and management postgraduates, as well as regulation theorists and practitioners will also find this book to be of great interest.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Conclusion: Global Regulatory Futures

Roger King


In the previous chapters we have explored the idea of the university as an organizational actor that is self-regarding and responsible. Increasingly its autonomy but also its importance to governments is leading to heightened and more formal processes of accountability. Although universities predominantly are rooted in national systems of funding, regulation and innovation, increasingly these processes, and the organization itself, are influenced and shaped by global standards and models. These models are the outcome of the actions of both state and non-state actors – sometimes they are located more in organizational fields – and frequently they operate for effectiveness through comparative peer pressures and horizontal monitoring by organizations. In some cases, private regulation, as found with university league tables, provides orderliness to a sector and helps to constitute markets, yet also debilitating aspects of national public policy. However, processes of dissemination of global standards, particularly those issuing from inter-governmental or supranational bodies and which require explicit national incorporation for their implementation, include a number of levels of diffusion that potentially constitute threats of an attenuation of commitment. Chains of implementation, and their critical levels and nodes, require careful analysis to distinguish between surface acceptance and onthe-ground ritualism and to consider where such divergences are found (as in the case of the Bologna Process, for example). Regulatory governance is increasingly a sophisticated and subtle matter for practitioners and is increasing its interest for academics and other analysts. Not only do the developing transnational networks of regulators – governmental and non-governmental – recognize that effective policy...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.