Nascent Entrepreneurship and Learning
Show Less

Nascent Entrepreneurship and Learning

Mine Karataş-Özkan and Elizabeth Chell

This informative book examines the process of nascent entrepreneurship from a learning perspective. It offers a multi-layered framework of nascent entrepreneurship through an inter-disciplinary approach and sound application of Bourdieu’s conceptual tools and also by generating practical insights for nascent entrepreneurs, enterprise educators and mentors.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Methodological Approach: Social Constructionist Paradigm and Bourdieu’s Relational Methodology

Mine Karataş-Özkan and Elizabeth Chell


INTRODUCTION TO THE CHAPTER 5.1 In wrestling with the ways in which these [research] philosophies forestructure our efforts to understand what it means to ‘do’ qualitative inquiry, what we face is not a choice of which label – interpretivist, constructivist, hermeneuticist, or something else – best suits us. Rather, we are confronted with choices about how each of us wants to live the life of a social inquirer (Schwandt, 2000, p. 205). The purpose of this chapter is to lay down the research paradigm underpinning the research. It starts with the definitions of ‘paradigm’ and an introduction of Burrell and Morgan’s (1979) four-grid paradigmatic approach. The social constructionist paradigm is then discussed as the underlying paradigm in the current research. This is followed by the elaboration of the terms ‘ontology’, ‘epistemology’ and ‘methodology’ in relation to the nature of this research. The chapter concludes with Bourdieu’s (Bourdieu, 1977, 1986, 1990, 1998; Bourdieu and Wacquant, 1992) frameworks, which are used in investigating nascent entrepreneurship and learning. 5.2 RESEARCH PARADIGMS Lincoln and Guba (1985, p. 15) argue that ‘paradigms represent a distillation of what we think about the world’. The term ‘paradigm’ derives from Kuhn’s (1970) thesis where he referred to a set of beliefs, values, assumptions and techniques, which serves as ‘a regulatory framework of metaphysical assumptions shared by members of a given community’ (Kuhn, 1970, p. 175). He views this web of belief as underpinning scientific communities and their practices (Lowe, 2004, p. 209). In this respect Lowe (2004) maintains it is...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.