Edited by Frank Boons and Jennifer Howard-Grenville
Second intermezzo A transdisciplinary perspective on industrial ecology research
Cynthia Mitchell INTRODUCTION In this ‘dialogue’ chapter, my intention is to contribute to the exchange of ideas between social science perspectives and SET (science, engineering, technology) perspectives in industrial ecology research. My brief from the editors is to reflect on the chapters exploring regional approaches. Specifically, I am tasked with reflecting on the elements of the work that resonate with my experience, that are different, and that raise questions, and to do so by connecting my responses to my experiences. This I found an intriguing brief, not least because it leaves me feeling somewhat exposed – this intermezzo is a public and enduring account of something akin to the process of review as well as an exploration of the development of my own epistemological stance. Having a dialogue between disciplines who share an interest in exploring and implementing industrial ecology concepts is essential for it to reach its potential. And the mode we have chosen for doing so here is something of a compromise, since it is just one iteration, rather than an ongoing dialogue. That said, I think it is a worthwhile step in a useful direction, so here goes . . . To respond, I firstly give a brief account of my perspective, such as it is now – that of an engineering- and science-trained transdisciplinary researcher engaged with making a difference. I have synthesized the reflections into three sections: resonant concepts, differences, and clarifying questions. MY PERSPECTIVE In the spirit of this being a narrative, I’ll begin by telling my story. My...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.