Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law
Show Less

Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law

Towards an Integrated Administration

Edited by Herwig C.H. Hofmann and Alexander H. Türk

The move towards a system of integrated administration in the EU poses considerable legal challenges. This book explores ways in which accountability, legality, legitimacy and efficiency can be ensured in the multiple forms of co-operation of European and national administrations in the delivery of EU and EC policies.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Participation and Participation Rights in EU Law and Governance

Joana Mendes


Joana Mendes*1 1. INTRODUCTION Participation is ubiquitous in EU law and governance. Participatory phases are found in decisional procedures defined in many regulations and directives, be these an obligation impinging upon Member States, be they a procedural duty of EU administrative bodies, either determined by the EU legislator or self-imposed. Participation can, therefore, be seen as a dominant feature of the governance arrangements which have developed over the last decades.12 However, since participation has manifold meanings, the extent of this pervasion may be deceptive. This is the case if one intends participation as the procedural intervention of natural and legal persons whose substantive rights and interests are potentially affected by a Community regulatory measure, with a view both to ensuring the procedural protection of those rights and interests and to attaining an accurate representation of the factual situation based on an exact representation and consideration of the interests involved on the part of the deciding body. This chapter argues that there is a mismatch between, on the one hand, the powers exerted by the European administration, particularly taking into account the effects which they may have in the legal sphere of persons concerned, and, on the other, the procedural guarantees which are afforded to them under the right to be heard as this has been developed by the European Courts (ECJ and CFI). Considered the core of the rights of the defence, the right to be heard, as it has been shaped by the Courts derives from an adversarial,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.