Lessons from America
- New Horizons in Law and Economics series
Edited by Jürgen G. Backhaus, Alberto Cassone and Giovanni B. Ramello
Chapter 11: Good Law and Economics Needs Better Microeconomic Models: The Case Against ‘Contingent Fees’ as Application of Agency Models to the Professions
JOBNAME: Ramello PAGE: 1 SESS: 12 OUTPUT: Tue Feb 28 11:47:52 2012 11. Good law and economics needs better microeconomic models: the case against ‘contingent fees’ as application of agency models to the professions Lorenzo Sacconi 1. INTRODUCTION Economic analysis of the law aims at understanding whether legal rules are designed as adequate mechanisms of incentive strong enough to induce economic agents (for example firms, workers, tax payers or professionals) to contribute efficiently to the creation of wealth, production of a surplus, producing a public good or the reduction of a public bad or a risk. One basic idea is that the law doesn’t reach its goal directly but rather through affecting the economic agents’ choices. They interact under the conditions put in place (in part) by a legal framework (and in part they react to these constraints) as far as economic agents are seen as (bounded) rational players participating in a game where the law sets the rules but doesn’t uniquely determine outcomes. Outcomes are produced by how economic agents make their choices under the constraints set (or by taking advantage of the opportunities posted) by the rules – inter alia. Thus, legal rules may generate the effects a legislator desires – if it was a wise ‘designer’, but also unexpected outcomes in the case that actual incentives and opportunities of action were not appropriately considered. The result will be consequently a (Nash) equilibrium induced by the rules (since the law influences the ‘rules of the game’), but not...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.