The Law and Economics of Class Actions in Europe
Show Less

The Law and Economics of Class Actions in Europe

Lessons from America

Edited by Jürgen G. Backhaus, Alberto Cassone and Giovanni B. Ramello

This well-documented book discusses the power and limitations of class actions with insights and analysis from a panel of distinguished scholars. It pays special attention to the introduction and the applicability of such a legal device in European civil law countries. The book offers a broad legal and economic investigation, drawing insights from US judicial experience and giving a rigorous discussion of both the philosophical and constitutional aspects and the economic mechanisms and incentives set up by class actions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: The Enforcement of Management Passivity Duty in Take-over Law: Class Action or Government Action?

Fernando Gomez and María Isabel Saez


* Fernando Gomez and María Isabel Saez 1. INTRODUCTION The behaviour of managers (in a broad sense, encompassing also the Directors) towards a tender offer for the acquisition of a company is crucial for the likelihood of success of the offer, and thus for shareholders’ welfare. The European Directive on Takeover Bids contains, following English Law on this matter, a passivity rule – or duty of abstention – forcing managers to abstain from actions that may influence the outcome of the tender offer, exempting only those that can lead to higher-price offers. The rule, however, does not appear to be straightforwardly desirable for many commentators, and for many legal systems as well. For instance, US Law does not contain such a rule, and among the European countries implementing the Directive, several have made use of the opting-out provisions allowed in the Directive. We think, however, that there are good reasons, both at the theoretical and at the empirical level, supporting the efficiency of the passivity rule. In fact, Section II of this chapter, besides characterizing the duty, provides several economic rationales for the optimality of the passivity rule in Takeover Law, particularly in the European context of mandatory and competitive bids. Our main focus, nevertheless, does not lie in the substantive efficiency properties of the issue of enforcement. We think that a central point missing in the debate on the passivity rule is precisely a crucial one: how the rule is enforced. Without appropriate enforcement, the rule would be * We are grateful...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.