Explaining Civil War
Show Less

Explaining Civil War

A Rational Choice Approach

Syed Mansoob Murshed

This book explores the pre-conditions for conflict in terms of growth failure and critically appraises the greed and grievance theories common to conflict literature. It is argued that various institutional mechanisms of restraint that can be labeled the ‘social contract’ are crucial for violent conflict avoidance. The reasons underpinning the instability of treaties ending civil wars, post-conflict reconstruction issues, liberal peace theory, and how globalization and conflict relate are also examined.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Greed and Grievance

Syed Mansoob Murshed


INTRODUCTION Chapter 2 explored the conflict and growth nexus. The failure of economic growth in the long-run is intimately linked to malfunctioning institutions that create problems of their own, including a repressive polity and rampant rent seeking, which may be encouraged by the presence of certain types of resource rents. The foundations for violent conflict are laid in a low-income developing country economy where the failure of growth and economic diversification is characterized by endemic poverty, high asset and income inequality and the failure of the mechanisms for peaceful dispute resolution.1 It is worth reminding ourselves that according to the rational choice paradigm, conflict is a result of choice. This may be myopic, as negotiated settlements which avoid the losses that ensue from war, are usually Pareto superior. Another way of stating this is that conflict is a special form of non-cooperative behaviour; other forms of less destructive non-cooperative behaviour, and cooperation, are superior to violent and therefore more costly non-cooperative interaction. But circumstances (constraints, poverty, institutional failure), mistrust (coordination failure), impatience and myopia (discounting the future) may rule out cooperation or more peaceful forms of non-cooperative negotiation, making conflict the optimal choice for group leaders who have to take into account at least some of the interests of their followers. In recent years, two phenomena have been utilized to explain conflict onset among rational choice theorists: greed and grievance. The former is due to the influential work of Paul Collier (see Collier and Hoeffler, 2002, 2004b). According to this...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.