Trade Liberalisation and The Poverty of Nations
Show Less

Trade Liberalisation and The Poverty of Nations

A. P. Thirlwall and Penélope Pacheco-López

This book argues that orthodox theory is based on many unreal assumptions, and that there are sound economic arguments for selective protection of industrial activities in the early stages of economic development. The historical evidence of the now-developed countries also illustrates this fact.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1: The Theory and Measurement of Trade Liberalisation

A. P. Thirlwall and Penélope Pacheco-López


Politicians and economists who promise that trade liberalisation will make everyone better off are being disingenuous. Economic theory (and historical experience) suggests the contrary. (Stiglitz, 2006) Introduction To consider the relationship between trade liberalisation and economic development, it is important to state at the outset what we mean by the process of economic development. The traditional measure of economic development, and what the theory of trade liberalisation focuses on, is the standard of living measured by the average level of per capita income of the citizens of a country. The static gains from trade liberalisation are supposed to raise the level of income in the process of resource reallocation according to the law of comparative advantage; and the dynamic gains from trade, associated with more competition, the flow of new knowledge and a faster rate of capital accumulation, are supposed to raise the growth of income. The focus on national income, or on the growth of income, as a measure of development 1 2 Trade liberalisation and the poverty of nations is not enough, however, for two main reasons. Firstly, what happens to the distribution of income within countries matters for the measurement of economic welfare. Trade liberalisation does not guarantee that all sectors of society will benefit equally. On the contrary, in the very process of liberalisation itself some groups will gain, but others, previously protected, will undoubtedly lose either relatively or absolutely through unemployment or a reduction in their real income. While total income and average per...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.