Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment
Show Less

Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment

Edited by Christoph Beat Graber and Mira Burri-Nenova

In the face of increasing globalisation, and a collision between global communication systems and local traditions, this book offers innovative trans-disciplinary analyses of the value of traditional cultural expressions (TCE) and suggests appropriate protection mechanisms for them. It combines approaches from history, philosophy, anthropology, sociology and law, and charts previously untravelled paths for developing new policy tools and legal designs that go beyond conventional copyright models. Its authors extend their reflections to a consideration of the specific features of the digital environment, which, despite enhancing the risks of misappropriation of traditional knowledge and creativity, may equally offer new opportunities for revitalising indigenous peoples’ values and provide for the sustainability of TCE.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: The Disneyland of Cultural Rights to Intellectual Property: Anthropological and Philosophical Perspectives

Elizabeth Burns Coleman


Elizabeth Burns Coleman In this paper I will argue against the concept of a human right to intellectual property in traditional cultural expressions (TCE), in so far as they are defined as arts. In so doing, however, I do not deny, and indeed intend to defend, the intuition that there are moral issues surrounding the use and transmission of TCE. I will argue that, while there is no human right to the protection of arts, not all TCE should be thought of as “arts”, as this misrepresents the functional role they play. However, once we see what role they play, and why we should accept that they are morally important, we should not think of them as human rights. 1. INTRODUCTION The “right to culture” is considered a human right. Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)1 states, that “[i]n those States in which ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities exist, persons belonging to such minorities shall not be denied the right, in the community with other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practice their own religion, or to use their own language”. The right to enjoy one’s culture might be considered uncontroversial if it were merely taken to mean that it would be wrong of a government to forcibly suppress or destroy the culture of an indigenous minority group. Yet, the United Nations Report “Protection of the Heritage of Indigenous Peoples”2 suggested that the term “enjoys...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.