Handbook on the Politics of Regulation
Show Less

Handbook on the Politics of Regulation

Edited by David Levi-Faur

This unique Handbook offers the most up-to-date and comprehensive, state-of-the-art reviews of the politics of regulation. It presents and discusses the core theories and concepts of regulation in response to the rise of the regulatory state and regulatory capitalism, and in the context of the ‘golden age of regulation’. Its eleven sections include forty-eight chapters covering issues as diverse and varied as: theories of regulation; historical perspectives on regulation; regulation of old and new media; risk regulation, enforcement and compliance; better regulation; civil regulation; European regulatory governance; and global regulation. As a whole, it provides an essential point of reference for all those working on the political, social, and economic aspects of regulation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 46: Regulatory Approaches to Climate Change Mitigation

Ian Bartle


Ian Bartle The challenge posed by climate change encapsulates a number of the key themes in modern regulatory governance. One important theme is how to interpret climate science and respond to risk and uncertainty. Despite the consensus among climate scientists about global warming, a difficult policy issue is the balance between a strategy of mitigation (limiting the greenhouse effect by reducing emissions) and a strategy of adaptation (reducing the negative effects of climate change). Modern ‘risk-based’ regulation, which involves attempts to inject objectivity into regulation with a more measured and calculative approach to risk (Hutter 2005), might suggest one approach. Precise assessments of climate change risk could inform decisions about how to respond; in particular, cost–benefit analysis could be undertaken on how to apportion money between mitigation and adaptation (Tol 2005). However, uncertainty pervades scientific knowledge of climate change, including the timing of temperature rises, what is ‘dangerous’ climate change, and whether and when a ‘tipping point’ will be reached after which catastrophic effects will ensue (Pachauri 2006; Schneider and Lane 2006: 7–23). Uncertainty suggests that a calculation to determine the balance between mitigation and adaptation cannot be undertaken in any meaningful way and points towards the importance of a strategy of mitigation. This leads to a second and central theme in regulatory governance: the regulatory approach to be adopted to reduce carbon emissions in order to mitigate climate change. As in the wider debates on regulatory governance, there is no consensus on the best approach to reduce...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.