Platforms of Innovation
Show Less

Platforms of Innovation

Dynamics of New Industrial Knowledge Flows

Edited by Philip Cooke, Carla De Laurentis, Stewart MacNeill and Chris Collinge

This ground-breaking book offers a coherent theoretical analysis of contemporary industrial knowledge flow dynamics. Furthermore, it advances wide-ranging and varied empirical findings from international comparative research which demonstrate that knowledge cross-pollination, often from industrially unrelated business sectors, is now commonplace in the economics of innovation. This, the authors argue, represents the rise of an externalized ‘matrix’ of knowledge flow dynamics among firms and industries. The book also examines related economic governance research that reveals the catalytic role that leading innovation policy agencies play in animating knowledge flow dynamics, particularly at the regional level. The chapters address various sectors including food and drink, biotechnology, ICT, new media, the automotive industry and tourism.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Knowledge Phases, Cognitive and Relational Distance in ICT Alliance Networks

Olivier Brossard and Jérôme Vicente


Olivier Brossard and Jérôme Vicente INTRODUCTION 5.1 There are several theoretical and empirical ways to study networks of innovators (Powell and Grodal, 2005). In this chapter, we focus mainly on the economic dimensions of knowledge dynamics in order to capture the reasons why firms engage in network relations. As a basic assumption, we suppose that knowledge is not only a public good – imperfect or impure though it may be – but also a complex and systemic good (Antonelli, 2005; Sorenson et al., 2006). Knowledge as an output is complex and systemic since it combines many interacting pieces of knowledge as inputs. Knowledge can be viewed as a ‘recipe’ which involves not just some peculiar combinations of ‘ingredients’, but also peculiar integration methods. Knowledge is therefore both complex and systemic insofar as its generation implies some systemic interdependencies between internal and external pieces of knowledge. However, network strategies are not the panacea for knowledge-based firms’ competitiveness. If firms improve their accessibility to external knowledge by establishing partnerships, they also face risks of appropriation defaults (Antonelli, 2006) in doing so. Network relations thus correspond to very peculiar strategies in which each participant considers that the benefits of accessibility exceed the risks of underappropriation. So that the relation may be of mutual advantage to them all, the partners establish collectively a specific network governance framework which especially defines the shared property rights structure. The information and communication technology (ICT) sector will help us to carry out this study theoretically and empirically. This...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.