Handbook of Research on Strategy Process
Show Less

Handbook of Research on Strategy Process

Edited by Pietro Mazzola and Franz W. Kellermanns

The Handbook of Research on Strategy Process reveals the current state of the art of strategy process research as a whole as well as emerging research initiatives. It also discusses managerial and organizational factors affecting strategy implementation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 15: Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Driving Force for Corporate Entrepreneurship

Esra Memili, G.T. Lumpkin and Gregory G. Dess


Esra Memili, G. T. Lumpkin and Gregory G. Dess INTRODUCTION Corporate entrepreneurship (CE) and entrepreneurial orientation (EO) have received considerable research interest as they are crucial to organizational survival, profitability, growth, and renewal (Zahra, 1996). Whereas CE serves the purpose of creation and pursuit of new venture opportunities and strategic renewal (Dess and Lumpkin, 2005), EO is the driving force for CE. Indeed, firms with a strong EO – involving the processes, practices, and decision-making styles that help firms identify and capture entrepreneurial opportunities – tend to have competitive advantages in pursuing CE activities that can take the form of internal or external corporate venturing, innovation, and/or strategic renewal (Covin and Slevin, 1991; Kuratko, 2005; Lumpkin and Dess, 1996; Sharma and Chrisman, 1999; Zahra, 1995). Hence, firms that want to successfully pursue CE need to have an EO (Dess and Lumpkin, 2005). Despite general agreement on the positive contribution of EO and CE, the field of entrepreneurship still lacks agreement on the definitions of terms and the distinctive characteristics of CE and EO (Sharma and Chrisman, 1999). The term ‘entrepreneurship’ is often used without differentiating between individual, group, and organizational entrepreneurship. In addition to ambiguity regarding the level of analysis, the difference between corporate entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial orientation seems to be conceptually unclear. Such a lack of theoretical clarity inhibits the specification of the domain of the constructs and the development of appropriate measures in empirical entrepreneurship studies, consequently preventing researchers’ scientific understanding, explanation, and prediction as well as limiting guidance available...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.