Leadership and Institutions in Regional Endogenous Development
Show Less

Leadership and Institutions in Regional Endogenous Development

  • New Horizons in Regional Science series

Robert Stimson, Roger R. Stough and Maria Salazar

The authors of this comprehensive book provide a detailed rationale and original theory for the study of leadership and institutional factors, including entrepreneurship, in the growth and development of cities and regions. They demonstrate why leadership, institutions and entrepreneurship can – and indeed do – play a crucial enhancing role as key elements in the process of regional endogenous growth.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 7: Case Studies from the United States

Robert Stimson, Roger R. Stough and Maria Salazar

Extract

7. Case studies from the United States In this chapter we present five case studies from the US. These are for: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Houston, Texas, Austin, Texas, the State of Colorado and Indianapolis, Indiana 7.1 7.1.1 PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, USA Background: An Industrial Collapse The collapse of the steel industry in the early 1980s hit Pittsburgh so forcefully that, in the period from 1979 to 1988, the region suffered a decline of 44 percent in manufacturing jobs (Clark, 1989: 41; Sbragia, 1990: 53–4). Such a decline caused the region to lead the nation in population loss during those years. However, by the late 1980s, Pittsburgh was rising from the debris of a collapsed steel industry, towards a city of standing in cultural offerings, with one of the best public education systems in the country, and very livable neighborhoods. Such an urban renaissance was not only due to the fact that Pittsburgh possessed potential sources of new employment and therefore was able to develop ‘new exports’, but also because it was the result of private and public leaders concerned with the region’s economic development (Sbragia, 1990: 53–4). In Pittsburgh, there has been a long history of cooperation. The culture of cooperation between the public and private sectors has been so sustained that it has given Pittsburgh policymaking a distinctive character. The recent prominent involvement of the non-profit sector in the city’s economic development strategy has also been noteworthy. The ‘politics of consensus’ describes Pittsburgh politics more accurately than it does...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.