Progress in the Competitive Agenda in the Postal and Delivery Sector
Show Less

Progress in the Competitive Agenda in the Postal and Delivery Sector

  • Advances in Regulatory Economics series

Edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer

Regulation continues to be an important issue in the postal and delivery sector of the global economy. This latest volume of the series covers progress made in the competitive agenda in the industry. It is global in scope and addresses topics of great importance to scholars and practitioners of postal regulation and public sector economics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 15: Using Operating Data to Measure Labor Input Variability and Density Economies in United States Postal Service Mail Processing Operations

A. Thomas Bozzo

Extract

15. Using operating data to measure labor input variability and density economies in United States Postal Service mail processing operations A. Thomas Bozzo* 1 INTRODUCTION Estimates of economic costs for postal products have a variety of well-known applications for postal pricing and regulation. Testing rates for cross-subsidy requires estimates of product-level incremental costs. Evaluating the allocative efficiency of rates and applying pricing models such as the efficient component pricing rule to worksharing discounts require estimates of marginal costs. In the United States, the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA) enacted language directing the use of causally determined costs for a cost-coverage requirement: that each class of mail or type of mail service bear the direct and indirect postal costs attributable to each class or type of mail service through reliably identified causal relationships plus that portion of all other costs of the Postal Service reasonably assignable to such class or type (39 USC 3622(c)(2)) and specified ‘avoided’ costs for evaluating US Postal Service (USPS) worksharing discounts: ‘The Postal Regulatory Commission shall ensure that such discounts do not exceed the cost that the Postal Service avoids as a result of workshare activity [subject to exceptions]’ (39 USC 3622(e)(2)). In US practice, cost coverage is measured with incremental cost1 and worksharing discounts are evaluated in terms of marginal cost avoidance. European Union postal directives express similar objectives for efficient and subsidy-free prices, while directing the use of fully distributed cost (FDC) accounting...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.