Employment, Growth and Development
Show Less

Employment, Growth and Development

A Post-Keynesian Approach

Edited by Claude Gnos, Louis-Philippe Rochon and Domenica Tropeano

This topical book addresses unemployment in Europe, the wrong-headed reliance on NAIRU to formulate policy, distributional conflicts and financial factors, as well as problems faced in developing countries with respect to exchange rate policy, central banking, challenges to growth, and international financial flows. In the first part of the book the chapters deal with issues related to employment policies, economic growth and development while the second part is dedicated to development and growth issues in open-economy developing countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Faith-based Macroeconomics: A Critique of Recent Developments in NAIRU Estimation

Dany Lang and Mark Setterfield


Dany Lang and Mark Setterfield 1. INTRODUCTION The idea of a non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment (NAIRU) is a well-established but controversial feature of modern macroeconomics. The NAIRU codifies a pre-Keynesian vision of the economy, according to which money is neutral and aggregate demand is irrelevant for the determination of output and employment, at least in the long run. Although critics of the NAIRU question its very existence (see, e.g., Galbraith 1997; Lang 2007), the concept has made deep inroads into macroeconomic policy circles, and there exists an extensive empirical literature that purports to identify the precise value of the NAIRU that policy makers should incorporate into their decisions. Our concern in this chapter is with recent developments in the literature that seeks to estimate the value of the NAIRU. A necessary condition for the existence of a NAIRU is dynamic homogeneity: the ‘Phillips curve’ should be homogeneous of degree one in lagged and/or expected inflation. But contemporary approaches to estimating the NAIRU typically assume rather than test for dynamic homogeneity, thus assuming (rather than testing for) the existence of a NAIRU. We argue that these developments remove the NAIRU from the domain of testable hypotheses and transform the concept into an article of faith. In terms of the Popper–Lakatos tradition in the methodology of science, this makes the contemporary empirical NAIRU literature a degenerative research programme. The remainder of our chapter is organized as follows. Sections 2 and 3 review conventional and more recent methods for estimating the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.