Happiness, Economics and Politics
Show Less

Happiness, Economics and Politics

Towards a Multi-Disciplinary Approach

Edited by Amitava Krishna Dutt and Benjamin Radcliff

This timely and important book presents a unique study of happiness from both economic and political perspectives. It offers an overview of contemporary research on the emergent field of happiness studies and contains contributions by some of the leading figures in the field.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Does Inequality Matter to Individual Welfare? An Initial Exploration Based on Happiness Surveys from Latin America

Carol Graham and Andrew Felton


8. Does inequality matter to individual welfare?1 An initial exploration based on happiness surveys from Latin America Carol Graham and Andrew Felton The effect of inequality on individual welfare remains a debated question in economics. It is a topic where strong normative judgments outweigh the existing empirical evidence, and debate is often acrimonious and polarized. For those who interpret inequality as a sign of opportunity and/or of rewards to productivity, it is difficult to accept that there are negative effects. For those that see inequality as a reflection of persistent disadvantage for particular segments of society, it is hard to see positive elements. And for those who are primarily concerned with the fostering of income growth (and perhaps with the reduction of absolute poverty), inequality is beside the point – a ‘luxury’ problem of sorts. Yet evidence from several empirical studies suggests that relative income differences matter to individual welfare, and in ways which are relevant to economic and political decisions. Relative differences seem to matter in two ways. The first is a levels effect. Two individuals of the same level of income perceive themselves differently if the average wealth of their relevant peer groups is different. There is also a related adaptation effect: as people’s incomes rise, so do their expectations. Thus it takes more income to increase their utility the same amount than when their income was at a lower level. This can be explained conventionally by declining marginal utility of wealth. We attempt to show in this...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.