The Economics of Ignorance and Coordination
Show Less

The Economics of Ignorance and Coordination

Subjectivism and the Austrian School of Economics

Thierry Aimar

This book clarifies the specific nature of the Austrian theory and restores the unity and open-mindedness of the Austrian school in general. The intention is not to offer a collection of different or parallel ideas, but rather to retrace, from a pedagogical and constructive perspective, the various stages of the construction of a well-founded theoretical edifice: from Ludwig von Mises to Murray Rothbard, from Friedrich Hayek to Israel M. Kirzner and from Lachmann to Lavoie. The book is a reconstitution of the way Austrian ideas and concepts organize themselves in a common structure.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Appendix: Schumpeter and the Austrian Tradition

Thierry Aimar


___________________________________________________ Complex relations It is difficult to avoid the dominant figure of Joseph Schumpeter when examining the theory of entrepreneurship; quite apart from the central position this question occupies in his work (The Theory of Economic Development, 1912; Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 1942) the fact that this economist was born and educated in Austria would seem to gain him at least some attention in the present book. However, he at no point claimed he followed the line of thought started by Menger or even less of his contemporary, Mises. It is true he was, with Mises, a member of Böhm-Bawerk’s seminar and he does name Carl Menger as one of the Ten Great Economists (1952), again paying homage to his ‘genius’ in his famous History of Economic Analysis (1954). Yet a few lines later he proclaims, Walras is in my opinion the greatest of all economists. His system of economic equilibrium, uniting, as it does, the quality of ‘revolutionary’ creativeness with the quality of classic synthesis, is the only work by an economist that will stand comparison with the achievements of theoretical physics. Compared with it, most of the theoretical writings of that period, – and beyond – however valuable in themselves and however original subjectively, look like boats beside a liner, like inadequate attempts to catch some particular aspect of Walrasian truth (1954, p. 827). As a result, Menger’s heirs’ view was unequivocal: Because Austrian economics is a theory of human action, Schumpeter does not belong to the Austrian school. In...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.