Rethinking the Case Study in International Business and Management Research
Show Less

Rethinking the Case Study in International Business and Management Research

Edited by Rebecca Piekkari and Catherine Welch

This important and original book critically evaluates case study practices and calls for a more pluralistic future for case research in international business (IB) and international management (IM).
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 1: Pluralism in International Business and International Management Research: Making the Case

Rebecca Piekkari and Catherine Welch

Extract

1. Pluralism in international business and international management research: making the case Rebecca Piekkari and Catherine Welch INTRODUCTION The purpose of the present volume is to bring together a variety of perspectives on the case study and enrich case study practices in international business (IB) and international management (IM) research. The case study is a key research strategy in the field but to date only a fairly narrow selection of possible case study approaches have been used (Piekkari et al. 2009). Researchers in IB and IM typically rely on a case study approach that could be characterized as ‘qualitative positivism’ (Prasad 2005, p. 4), and which is loosely derived from the guidelines set out by Eisenhardt (1989) or Yin (2009). This approach to the case study has become a ‘disciplinary convention’ that prevails even in situations when there would have been another, more appropriate way of ‘getting the case study right’. In this book, we position this convention in relation to its alternatives, offering a range of viable options for practising case researchers as well as guidance for those who evaluate case studies. The dominance of qualitative positivism is not a surprise, given the history of the case study in business and management research. A key milestone for the legitimization of the case study within business and management was the publication of Yin’s seminal text in 1984. Platt (1992) has observed that this legitimization occurred at the expense of some of the long-established assumptions, practices and aims associated with this...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.