Europe, Globalization and the Lisbon Agenda
Show Less

Europe, Globalization and the Lisbon Agenda

Edited by Maria João Rodrigues

The Lisbon Agenda aims to prepare Europe for globalization by updating European policies for research, innovation, competition, trade, employment, education, social protection, environment and energy at both the European and national levels. Designed to inspire the new cycle of the Lisbon Agenda until 2010 and beyond, this timely and significant volume explores the intellectual elaboration of the agenda for the coming years.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: The Lisbon Strategy: Merits, Difficulties and Possible Reforms

Robert Boyer


9. The Lisbon Strategy: merits, difficulties and possible reforms Robert Boyer 9.1 THE LISBON STRATEGY IN RETROSPECT Although short, the history of the strategy launched in Lisbon by the European Council in March 2000 may be usefully and briefly revisited. The so-called Lisbon Strategy has three main components: first, the goal is to promote growth and employment by maintaining a highly competitive European economy; second, it proposes an input, namely a coupling innovation with the preservation of social cohesiveness, as a compromise between market liberalization and a social democratic approach under the umbrella of a Schumpeterian vision of innovation; and third, it is a method, that is, the so-called open method of coordination (OMC), that was devised to overcome the present distribution of competences between Member States and Brussels, and to promote the structural reforms required to fulfil the Lisbon objectives at the national level. The origin of this institutional innovation was clearly associated with the tendency towards increasing divergence between the United States and Europe, and the emergence of new pressures on the European welfare state (ageing, obsolescence of worker competences and persisting mass unemployment). The collapse of the Internet bubble, the emergence of China and India as major players in the world economy, and recurring demands by citizens for more security and related pressure on the so-called ‘European social model’ suggest that the diagnosis of early 2000 is even more valid today than it was before. It is not surprising, then, that even the more...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.