Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge
Show Less

Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge

Case Studies and Conflicting Interests

Edited by Tania Bubela and E. Richard Gold

This fascinating study describes efforts to define and protect traditional knowledge and the associated issues of access to genetic resources, from the negotiation of the Convention on Biological Diversity to The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Nagoya Protocol. Drawing on the expertise of local specialists from around the globe, the chapters judiciously mix theory and empirical evidence to provide a deep and convincing understanding of traditional knowledge, innovation, access to genetic resources, and benefit sharing.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Respecting and Aligning Knowledge Systems in Northern Canada: Beyond the International Polar Year

David S. Hik, Tania Bubela and Scot Nickels


David S. Hik, Tania Bubela and Scot Nickels INTRODUCTION During the past decade there has been growing interest in reconciling the influence and rights of Arctic residents within existing and emerging legal, governmental and scientific frameworks.1 Community-driven and collaborative research, where traditional and local knowledge (TK) has been considered an equally valuable knowledge system alongside Western science, has emerged. In Canada, these programmes include the Northern Contaminants Program, some research projects associated with the International Polar Year, and with the large Networks of Centers of Excellence project devoted to Arctic research, ArcticNet. The existing legal framework in Northern Canada, described by Metcalf and Bubela in the previous chapter, requires scientists working in Canada’s north to consult with First Nations and Inuit communities when conducting research within their territory, but there is no requirement for sharing benefits. As noted by Metcalf and Bubela, the duty to consult with Aboriginal peoples and to integrate their perspective, including TK, in decision-making and administrative processes that affect them is apparent in a wide range of federal 1 Aspen Institute, ‘The Shared Future: A Report of the Aspen Institute Commission On Arctic Climate Change’ (Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute, 2011) available at: (last accessed November 2011) [Aspen Institute]; M.T.Bravo, ‘Arctic science, nation building and citizenship’, in Francis Abele, Thomas J. Courchene, F. Leslie Seidle & France St-Hilaire, eds, Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers, and Prospects in Canada’s North (Montreal: Institute for Research in Public Policy, 2009) at 141; David M. Brock, ‘When is research relevant...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.