Geography, Structural Change and Economic Development
Show Less

Geography, Structural Change and Economic Development

Theory and Empirics

Edited by Neri Salvadori, Pasquale Commendatore and Massimo Tamberi

The authors in this book regard the process of economic expansion as a non-homogeneous and multifaceted phenomenon which has deeply affected human welfare, and cultural, social and political change. The book is a bridge between the theorists (Rosenstein-Rodan, Lewis, Myrdal, and Hirschmann) who in the post-war period analyzed regional inequalities, structural change and dualism, and the modern literature on economic growth. The latter has emphasized the existence of multiple equilibria, bifurcations and various types of dynamic complexity, and clarified the conditions for the emergence of phenomena such as cumulative causation, path dependence and hysteresis. These are the typical ingredients of structural change, economic development or underdevelopment.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 9: Distribution of Agricultural Surplus and Industrial Takeoff

Ennio Bilancini and Simone D’Alessandro


9. Distribution of agricultural surplus and industrial takeoff * Ennio Bilancini and Simone D’Alessandro 9.1. INTRODUCTION This chapter analyses how the distribution of agricultural product between landlords and peasants affects both industrial takeoff and aggregate income through the demand side. Our contribution follows that part of the literature on structural change which investigates the link between inequality, industrialization and income and that focuses on the effects of income distribution on demand (see for instance Murphy et al., 1989; Baland and Ray, 1991; Eswaran and Kotwal, 1993; Matsuyama, 2002; Fiaschi and Signorino, 2003).1 We follow the traditional modelling approach of this literature assuming a dual economy (see Rosenstein-Rodan, 1943; Lewis, 1954, 1967; Fleming, 1955). However, our model is built on that proposed by Murphy et al. (1989) in which industrialization is triggered by the domestic demand for manufactures. The key assumptions in Murphy et al. (1989) are that i) individuals have hierarchical preferences, ii) industrial production shows increasing returns because of a fixed set up cost, and iii) a fraction of the labour force receives, besides wages, a share of profits and rents. Given i), ii) and iii), the distribution of shares affects the composition of demand which, in turn, affects the profitability of mass production. The conclusion is that industrialization requires a ‘middle class as the source of the buying power for domestic manufactures’ (Murphy et al., 1989, p. 538). As in Bilancini and D’Alessandro (2005), we maintain the first two key assumptions of Murphy et al. (1989) while substituting...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.