Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change
Show Less

Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change

Edited by Cristiano Antonelli

This comprehensive and innovative Handbook applies the tools of the economics of complexity to analyse the causes and effects of technological and structural change. It grafts the intuitions of the economics of complexity into the tradition of analysis based upon the Schumpeterian and Marshallian legacies.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Causes, Consequences and Dynamics of ‘Complex’ Distributions of Technological Activities: The Case of Prolific Inventors

William Latham and Christian Le Bas


William Latham and Christian Le Bas1 1. INTRODUCTION In this chapter individuals constitute the unit of analysis. Individuals must be considered because innovation is not simply a product of firms and organizations, it requires individual creativity. A century ago Schumpeter clearly identified the individual entrepreneur as essential to technological development. We follow this Schumpeterian notion that innovation, a form of creativity very much like entrepreneurial activity, is fundamentally individual in its genesis. Firms and organizations can create conditions that enhance or detract from the innovative activity of individuals, but it is the individuals who innovate. Yet we also know that not all individuals innovate (or invent) equally. Among individuals, even among individual entrepreneurs or firm innovators, innovation is not uniformly distributed. This heterogeneity among individuals is, of course, not unrelated to the existence of technological gaps across firms and organizations as far as innovation activities are concerned. Variation across firms is especially important in evolutionary economics and was recognized explicitly by Alfred Marshall. It is a natural outcome in a world marked by competition where organizations have heterogeneous bases of competences, different sets of strategies and, as a consequence, perform differently (see Metcalfe, 1995). In other words, we are in Antonelli’s world of ‘organized complexity’ as he describes it in the introduction to this book. Figure 9.1 illustrates heterogeneity among inventors using the distribution of US patents for the most productive French inventors (those with 15 or more inventions) over the period from 1975 to 2002. The distribution is characterized...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.