Cross-border Online Gambling Law and Policy
Show Less

Cross-border Online Gambling Law and Policy

Julia Hörnle and Brigitte Zammit

This highly topical book analyses the conflicts between different regulatory regimes governing online gambling in the international context and how these affect the cross-border provision of online gambling.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: EU Conflicts of Law Issues – Part 1: Jurisdiction

Julia Hörnle and Brigitte Zammit


Brigitte Zammit 5.1 JURISDICTIONAL RULES IN CONTRACTUAL ONLINE GAMBLING DISPUTES In a commercial ‘global village’, where messengers on horseback have been replaced by electronic pulses generated by a few clicks of electronic keys, and where geographical distances pose no barrier to instantaneous communication between persons living on opposite sides of the world, fertile ground exists for cross-border disputes to sprout. The significantly transnational and ubiquitous nature of e-commerce, of which online gambling is an example, necessarily gives rise to conflict of laws issues,1 primarily jurisdictional issues concerned with determining the forum that is legally competent to adjudicate thereon. The legal challenges that are directly posed by online gambling to such jurisdictional issues within the EU constitute the focus of this chapter. Given this scope, primary reference shall be made to the jurisdictional rules in the Brussels Regulation on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (‘the Brussels Regulation’).2 The jurisdictional competence of EU Member State national courts is directly regulated3 in a harmonized manner by this Regulation. It is this Regulation The terms ‘private international law’ and ‘conflict of laws’ are used interchangeably in these remaining chapters of the book to refer to the area of law concerned with (1) determining jurisdictional issues in cross-border disputes, (2) determining which of the competing States’ laws in such disputes are to be applied to resolve the same, and (3) enforcing foreign judgments. 2 Council Regulation 44/2001/EC of 22 December 2000 (OJ L 12, 16...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.