Continuity and Change in Public Policy and Management
Show Less

Continuity and Change in Public Policy and Management

Christopher Pollitt and Geert Bouckaert

Combining theory development, international comparison and original case study analysis, two of Europe’s leading public policy and management scholars apply and develop some of the main models of policy change and offer a revealing long-term view of policy developments since 1965. Drawing on an extensive programme of elite interviews and documentary analysis they provide an integrated treatment of national and local policymaking in two major public services – hospital care and the police – in England and Belgium. This timely book addresses the ‘paradigm wars’ in public policy, arguing for a nuanced intermediate position that challenges the orthodox and the post-modernists alike.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: National Reforms: Police

Christopher Pollitt and Geert Bouckaert


KEY INSTITUTIONS IN POLICE POLICY In both countries the key institutions evolved over the period of study, and some new ones emerged. The most obvious pattern in England was the creation (or enhancement) of a series of national-level bodies to deal with the perceived gap left by the famous absence of a national police force. These included bodies devoted to scrutiny or improvement, such as a strengthened and more inquisitive HM Inspectorate of Constabulary, the Audit Commission (which has carried out a number of influential performance audits of different aspects of policing – see, for example, Audit Commission, 1990, 1996) and, more recently, the National Policing Improvement Agency. Alongside these have appeared a number of new executive and operational units, including the National DNA Database, the National Criminal Intelligence Service, the Home Office Police Standards Unit and the Serious Organised Crime Agency. Perhaps most important of all has been the development of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO): The Home Office has . . . encouraged (ACPO) to develop a much higher profile and expand its role, as a means of enhancing the standardization and centralization of policing. (Reiner, 2000, p. 192; see also Jones, 2008, pp. 7–8) By 2004 the ACPO appears repeatedly on the face of government planning documents, cited as a partner and guarantor of the professionalism of the proposed measures (for example Home Office, 2004). In Belgium our period begins with three main groups of police, each rather different from each other. First there was the national police...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.