Chapter 10: Extra- contractual civil liability
A good point to start our discussion of civil liability is the 1973 Quebec appeal case of Katz v. Reitz,1 decided under the old Civil Code. The Court of Appeal found that a property owner who, whilst constructing an apartment building on his own land, caused a neighbour’s single family dwelling to collapse had to pay compensation, even though he had taken all reasonable precautions to prevent such collapse from happening. At first sight, the decision seems classical: those who violate other people’s rights have to pay compensation for the damage thus caused. Compensation restores balance. This rule was codified in the new Quebec Civil Code of 1994 in articles 991 and 976.2 Yet at the time, the decision caused an uproar. It seemed to abandon the civil law principle that bases extra- contractual civil liability, also called delictual or quasi- delictual liability, on fault (faute in French, culpa in Latin) or wrongful behaviour.3 Fault is conduct not in keeping with what an informed, prudent person would have done under the circumstances. What this standard requires may vary over time and from place to place; it may depend on the nature of the fault, on the particular knowledge and skills of the wrongdoer, as well as on local practices and customs.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.