Organizations, Markets and Imperial Formations
Show Less

Organizations, Markets and Imperial Formations

Towards an Anthropology of Globalization

Edited by Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee, Vanessa C.M. Chio and Raza Mir

This authoritative book explores the nexus between organization theory, globalization and imperialism and examines the effects of a global order organized around development and markets.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Contesting Boundaries: The Shifting Borders of Globalization

Diana J. Wong-MingJi


Diana J. Wong-MingJi INTRODUCTION Discussions of globalization often include frequent commentaries about blurring boundaries, which imply they are either diminishing in relevance or disappearing altogether. Ohmae (1990) described the increasing trend of globalization as ultimately leading to a ‘borderless world’ where boundaries essentially become meaningless. Mantras from convergence theories refer to declining trade barriers; free and rapid flows of peoples, goods, services, and ideas; integration of societies and economics; and alliance networks of new organizational forms, and rising tides of development and wealth proliferate many of the arguments in support of globalization (Dunning, 1995). In this context, boundaries are problematic obstacles that impede globalization and must be overcome in the interest of progressing with the agenda of economic integration and general societal well-being. More importantly, the projected images of globalization from such discourse create a sense of inevitability that cannot or should not be resisted or stopped, and to do so would be a foolhardy futile enterprise or backward looking. Yet a growing chorus, albeit fragmented from different quarters, is questioning, resisting, and opposing the seemingly inescapable tsunami of globalization. The collection of voices comes from wide ranging and disparate perspectives that include trade unionists, environmentalists, farmers, blue-collar industrial workers, faith-based communities, human rights advocates, intellectual thinkers and researchers, and so on (Ancelovici, 2002; Cox and Jones, 1999). Their objections to globalization illustrate that boundaries as defined by blurring borders are not dissolving and giving way to a borderless world. Instead, boundaries are actually spaces where global contestations...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.