Organizations, Markets and Imperial Formations
Show Less

Organizations, Markets and Imperial Formations

Towards an Anthropology of Globalization

Edited by Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee, Vanessa C.M. Chio and Raza Mir

This authoritative book explores the nexus between organization theory, globalization and imperialism and examines the effects of a global order organized around development and markets.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Flexible Careers in a Globally Flexible Market

Suzette Dyer


7. Flexible careers in a globally flexible market Suzette Dyer INTRODUCTION The development and implementation of organization and labour flexibilities in the 1980s transformed the structure, nature and composition of paid employment. By the end of the 1980s and throughout the 1990s, these flexibilities were being theoretically and practically embedded in two emerging, yet quite distinct, discourses of globalization and of career management and development. These discourses share certain liberal assumptions about freedom and individuality and converge in the metaphoric space of organization. Collectively they capture, describe, endorse and prescribe changes to global political, economic and sociocultural arrangements, the nature and composition of paid employment, and what it means to have a career. Proponents of liberalization argue that this socioeconomic and political framework improves business profit, social wellbeing and personal choice. Critics point to disparate outcomes associated with workplace change and the extension of liberalization through globalization with the benefits accruing to particular powerful elites. In this chapter I argue that the three discourses of globalization, organizational and labour flexibility and career represent macro, meso, and micro level aspects of the extension of neo-liberalism as an organizing principle for all aspects of life. My focus in this chapter is on the disciplinary function of career management and development within this framework. My argument is presented in four sections. In the next section, the disciplinary analysis offered by Foucault (1977), Rose (1990) and Deetz (1992) is briefly reviewed. Their combined work helps make visible links between the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.