Policy, Performance and Management in Governance and Intergovernmental Relations
Show Less

Policy, Performance and Management in Governance and Intergovernmental Relations

Transatlantic Perspectives

Edited by Edoardo Ongaro, Andrew Massey, Marc Holzer and Ellen Wayenberg

This innovative book presents a transatlantic comparison of governance and Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) policy, performance and management.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Pathways of Policy Making: The Political Dynamics of Intergovernmental Lawmaking and Reform in the United States

Tim Conlan and Paul Posner


Tim Conlan and Paul Posner EXPLAINING INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY MAKING Because intergovernmental relations intersect with virtually all fields of domestic policy making in the United States, explaining the political dynamics of intergovernmental policy making is no easy task. It may be characterized by stability or bouts of sudden change, instances of high salience and low visibility, cases of interest group dominance and seeming impotence, bipartisanship here and bitter partisanship there. Take, for example, the enactment and proliferation of categorical grants in the United States. There are hundreds of separately authorized categorical grant programs that address issues ranging from community policing to state adoption services to urban mass transit, with many programs sponsored or supported by Democrats and Republicans alike. Yet, at various points over the past 50 years, this system of categorical aid has come under attack, with hundreds of programs proposed for consolidation or termination in occasional waves of reform. Often these consolidation efforts have been part of a broader partisan agenda involving reforms and cutbacks in federal activity extending well beyond the categorical grant structure.1 The ‘Contract with America’ in 1995 was one prominent example; the ‘new federalisms’ of Nixon and Reagan were others. Yet, at other times, the grant consolidation movement has been advanced by policy and management experts in the intergovernmental arena, such as the Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) and the General Accounting Office (GAO), with few partisan overtones. How are we to explain these wide variations in the political dynamics of intergovernmental policy making...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.