Policy, Performance and Management in Governance and Intergovernmental Relations
Show Less

Policy, Performance and Management in Governance and Intergovernmental Relations Transatlantic Perspectives

Transatlantic Perspectives

Edited by Edoardo Ongaro, Andrew Massey, Marc Holzer and Ellen Wayenberg

This innovative book presents a transatlantic comparison of governance and Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) policy, performance and management.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: Distributing Benefits and Burdens: Assessing Performance of the US Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer System

Jeremy L. Hall

Extract

14. Distributing benefits and burdens: assessing performance of the US intergovernmental fiscal transfer system Jeremy L. Hall1 INTRODUCTION: THE US INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER SYSTEM The US system of intergovernmental fiscal transfers impacts local places differently. Because competitive grant funding is the combined result of federal programs and local decisions to pursue federal grant support, the effects depend not only on the federal funding criteria, but also on local capacity to pursue funding and local strategy for financing needed projects. Local strategies might vary in terms of the extent to which they rely on internal versus external sources of funding, and the extent to which they utilize current revenues rather than debt instruments to finance projects. Extreme reliance on external funding has been characterized as dependency (Hedge 1983; Stein 1981, 1984). Because federal funding impacts places differently, the systematic impact of federal funding is not uniform. In the realm of performance measurement, actors at each level characterize their goals, and thus their performance differently (what Koppell (2005) refers to as multiple accountabilities disorder). Federal agencies are accountable with regard to the funding process, and local recipients are accountable for the performance of their projects or programs. If local projects are funded with federal money accountability extends to federal agencies as well as to local stakeholders. Given these traditional accountability foci at each level, the systematic impacts of the federal funding system go overlooked. Because responsibility is shared, accountability is diffuse and the systematic effects go unmeasured and unnoticed (what Romzek & Dubnick (1987)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.