The International Handbook of Gender and Poverty
Show Less

The International Handbook of Gender and Poverty

Concepts, Research, Policy

Edited by Sylvia Chant

In the interests of contextualising (and nuancing) the multiple interrelations between gender and poverty, Sylvia Chant has gathered writings on diverse aspects of the subject from a range of disciplinary and professional perspectives, achieving extensive thematic as well as geographical coverage. This benchmark volume presents women’s and men’s experiences of gendered poverty with respect to a vast spectrum of intersecting issues including local to global economic transformations, family, age, ‘race’, migration, assets, paid and unpaid work, health, sexuality, human rights, and conflict and violence.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Gender, Time Poverty and Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Evidence From Guatemala

Sarah Gammage


Sarah Gammage Time poverty as one dimension of capability poverty How poverty is defined depends very much upon the purpose for which we wish to enumerate deficits or deficiencies according to the different characteristics that we believe are important for describing well-being. Following Amartya Sen (1999), conventional measures of poverty or deficiency, that focus on per capita household income or consumption and express these in terms of a money metric, miss important dimensions of deficits that affect individual freedoms and well-being. For Sen the foundation of poverty analysis should be the ‘substantive freedom’ or ‘capabilities’ that enable an individual to choose a life that she or he values. A focus on capabilities, especially as part of a multidimensional analysis of poverty, would vary depending on the context, the level and unit of analysis, the information available, and the freedoms considered. As both Alkire (2008) and Sen (1999) identify, there is no single list of capabilities nor a unique array of spheres or dimensions that describe these capabilities, nor techniques to combine these spheres that can be relevant in all circumstances. As a result, one of the strengths of a capability approach is that the researchers can employ multiple analytical techniques and measurements of poverty, selecting those that appear to be most relevant for the analysis they wish to undertake. The challenge in this instance is limiting the relevant dimensions of the capabilities under consideration. Alkire (2008) identifies two main criteria for choosing those dimensions of the relevant capabilities for an...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.