The International Handbook of Gender and Poverty
Show Less

The International Handbook of Gender and Poverty

Concepts, Research, Policy

Edited by Sylvia Chant

In the interests of contextualising (and nuancing) the multiple interrelations between gender and poverty, Sylvia Chant has gathered writings on diverse aspects of the subject from a range of disciplinary and professional perspectives, achieving extensive thematic as well as geographical coverage. This benchmark volume presents women’s and men’s experiences of gendered poverty with respect to a vast spectrum of intersecting issues including local to global economic transformations, family, age, ‘race’, migration, assets, paid and unpaid work, health, sexuality, human rights, and conflict and violence.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 53: Household Wealth and Women’s Poverty: Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Assessing Gender Inequality in Asset Ownership

Carmen Diana Deere


Carmen Diana Deere One of the main criticisms levelled at poverty studies is that they are inevitably based on the household as the unit of analysis. This means that a gender analysis of poverty is usually limited to analysing the differences between male and female household heads or men and women based on per capita indicators (Medeiros and Costa, 2008; also Sen, Chapter 13, this volume). This approach tells us little about the relative poverty of men and women within households and specifically, about the situation of women in maleheaded households. This chapter considers the extent to which a focus on asset ownership can shed light on intrahousehold inequality and hence, on women’s poverty relative to men’s. A trend in recent poverty studies is that they complement income or consumption measures with broader measures that take into account the multifaceted dimensions of poverty. Among these approaches are those that focus on a household’s standard of living as measured by deprivations (in respect of running water, electricity, and so on) and the assets-based approach. Assets-based studies generally give combined attention to human, physical, financial, natural and social capital assets (see Moser, Chapter 60, this volume). To date neither of these approaches has been gendered beyond the usual headship measure. Deere and Doss (2006) propose a focus on the gender distribution of wealth as a means of examining gender inequality within the household. Economists define wealth as the value of physical and financial assets minus debt (Davies, 2008). The standard components of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.