The International Handbook of Gender and Poverty
Show Less

The International Handbook of Gender and Poverty

Concepts, Research, Policy

Edited by Sylvia Chant

In the interests of contextualising (and nuancing) the multiple interrelations between gender and poverty, Sylvia Chant has gathered writings on diverse aspects of the subject from a range of disciplinary and professional perspectives, achieving extensive thematic as well as geographical coverage. This benchmark volume presents women’s and men’s experiences of gendered poverty with respect to a vast spectrum of intersecting issues including local to global economic transformations, family, age, ‘race’, migration, assets, paid and unpaid work, health, sexuality, human rights, and conflict and violence.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 59: Gender, Poverty and Social Capital: The Case of Oaxaca City, Mexico

Katie Willis


Katie Willis Introduction: social capital and poverty alleviation Since the mid-1990s, social capital has been increasingly identified as a tool in povertyalleviation strategies in the Global South. While there are significant debates about what social capital is (see Bebbington, 2008, for a useful review in relation to development), definitions usually revolve around social ties, the nature of those relations and their use. For Moser (1998: 4) social capital can be defined as ‘reciprocity within communities and between households based on trust deriving from social ties’. Social capital can therefore be seen as an asset held by individuals, households or communities to enable them to meet their needs, or to be mobilised as part of development interventions. In this chapter I focus on social capital as an asset for individuals and households alongside other tangible assets (such as property) and intangible stocks (such as cultural capital). This focus on what households (particularly the poorest) have, rather than what they lack, has been consolidated into the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach (SLA) which has been adopted by international development organisations, most notably the United Kingdom (UK) Department for International Development (DFID).1 Despite the widespread adoption of the concept of social capital, gender, as Molyneux (2002) highlights, has often been ignored, or problematic gendered assumptions about social capital have been used in policy design and implementation. These assumptions include the essentialisation of women as good social networkers with well-developed contacts, particularly in the local ‘community’. As such, women are viewed as potential channels through...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.