Strategic Alliances, Mergers and Acquisitions
Show Less

Strategic Alliances, Mergers and Acquisitions

The Influence of Culture on Successful Cooperation

Edited by Jan Ulijn, Geert Duysters and Elise Meijer

This unique book focuses on the link between different types of culture (national, corporate, professional) and the success of strategic alliances, mergers and acquisitions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Why do International Alliances Fail? Some Insights from Culture and Human Social Biology

Gert Jan Hofstede


Gert Jan Hofstede INTRODUCTION In recent decades, enterprises in many sectors have been globalizing. Pressures to innovate have intensified. When two or more partners in several countries have complementary skills or advantages, this gives rise to international collaborative ventures. Das and Teng (2000) define them as ‘inter-firm cooperative arrangements aimed at pursuing mutual strategic objectives’. These can have various configurations, for example joint ventures, research and development (R&D) alliances or supply networks. In the management literature the term used most frequently is ‘strategic alliances’; we shall say ‘alliances’ for short. These have in common that they are voluntary, long-term collaborative efforts by a number of independent organizations. Such an effort requires investing in mutual relationships, and crucially, dividing risks, rewards, property rights and decision rights, in order to function. The number of international alliances is sharply on the rise. De Man and Duysters (2007) present data from 200 global companies across sectors and countries showing a rise from 200 to 2750 in the period 1996–2006. Alliances frequently fail though; average success rates are around 50 per cent. About 10 per cent of companies succeed in almost all their alliances, while another 10 per cent fail in almost all their alliances. Among NonChinese companies that ally with Chinese companies, this distribution is different: 30 per cent fail in almost all their alliances, while 25 per cent are almost always successful in their alliances. This distribution suggests that those non-Chinese partners either get it really right, or entirely wrong. Why...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.