The New Economics of Technology Policy
Show Less

The New Economics of Technology Policy

Edited by Dominique Foray

This book focuses on technological policies, in other words all public interventions intended to influence the intensity, composition and direction of technological innovations within a given entity (region, country or group of countries). The editor has gathered together many of the leading scholars in the field to comprehensively explore numerous avenues and pathways of research. The book sheds light on the theory and practice of technological policies by employing modern analytical tools and economic techniques.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: What Does Economic Theory Tell us About Mission-oriented R & D?

David C. Mowery


12. What does economic theory tell us about mission-oriented R&D?1 David C. Mowery INTRODUCTION: THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM 12.1 The economic rationale for public funding of research and development (R&D) has remained largely unchanged since its articulation in seminal work by Nelson (1959) and Arrow (1962). Both scholars argued that the difficulties of appropriating the returns from investment in research and innovation lead private firms to underinvest in these activities, creating a ‘market failure’ that can be addressed by (among other things) public investment in R&D. In a number of respects, this theoretical rationale echoed the policy arguments laid out by Vannevar Bush in his 1945 report, Science: The Endless Frontier. The market failure rationale remains central to the economic analysis of science and technology policy. Although the market failure rationale retains great rhetorical influence as a justification for public R&D investments, casual empiricism suggests that its influence over such public investments is modest. Most Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) nations’ R&D investment budgets are dominated by programs that serve specific government missions, such as defense, agriculture, health, energy, and other activities. The ‘market failure’ rationale underpins less than 50 percent of public R&D spending in most of these economies. The dominance of government R&D spending by mission-oriented programs is hardly a new discovery.2 But the apparent failure of the primary theoretical justification for public R&D investment to explain the allocation of these funds has some important implications....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.