Edited by Dominique Foray
Chapter 25: Comments
David Encaoua Even if the preceding two chapters do not deal exactly with the same notions, their topics overlap to some extent. This allows a joint discussion with specific comments, when necessary, to either one or the other chapter. Both chapters contribute to open the discussion on two very interesting and general issues: 1. What is the role of collaborative user-centered innovators (Eric von Hippel terminology) or peer production (Yochai Benkler terminology) in the dynamics of innovation? Do we need specific public policies to support or to favor this form of collaborative research based on the principle of non-exclusion and free disclosure? And if the answer is yes, what should these policies be? I will structure my discussion around the following questions: 1. Is it possible to draw some boundary between projects for which research activity could be organized around collaborative usercentered or peer production principles and those that could not? In other words, what are the main drivers of the development of the open cooperative research regime? Can the agents’ behavior in the peer production system be characterized as a form of ‘involuntary altruism’ or is it better to describe their behavior as reflecting specific preferences towards equity and fairness? Finally, what can we say on government policies to support or favour the open regime? 2. 2. 3. 25.1 THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN DIFFERENT RESEARCH REGIMES Let me begin by recalling the main notions. According to Eric von Hippel terminology, user innovators are either firms or individuals that develop innovations...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.