Research Handbook on the Theory and History of International Law
Show Less

Research Handbook on the Theory and History of International Law

Edited by Alexander Orakhelashvili

This pioneering Research Handbook, with contributions from renowned experts, provides a comprehensive scholarly framework for analyzing the theory and history of international law. Given the multiplication of theoretical approaches over the last three decades, and attendant fragmentation of scholarly efforts, this edited collection presents a useful doctrinal platform that will help academics and students to see the theory and history of international law in its entirety, and to understand how interdependent various aspects of the theory and history of international law really are.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Natural Law and the Law of Nations

Patrick Capps


Patrick Capps 3.1 INTRODUCTION Modern natural lawyers hold that all legal norms must be practically reasonable if they are to be valid or binding. An act or a norm can be said to be practically reasonable if it is consistent with a set of other-regarding, or moral, constraints. So, natural lawyers make the claim that there is some intimate connection between law and morality. The moral content of law is usually to be found in concepts like the common good or human dignity. Natural law comes in strong and weak varieties. The stronger version has morality performing an analytical or classificatory function: lex injusta non est lex. The weaker version has morality performing a normative function: law is defective if it does not correspond to morality.1 The opposing position, legal positivism, denies a necessary connection between law and morality and holds that law is to be identified with reference to a social source.2 All of these positions have found adherents in modern international legal theory. Historically, however, we see positivism emerging in international law as a dominant position in the later part of the nineteenth century, even though its central claims have a longer history. Prior to this, natural law theory can be said to be the dominant theory by which the authority and content of the law of nations was justified. The application of natural law theory to the law of nations became popular in the late sixteenth century. For Lesaffer, there is an obvious cause of the turn...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.