International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships
Show Less

International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships

Edited by Graeme A. Hodge, Carsten Greve and Anthony E. Boardman

In this timely Handbook, leading scholars from around the world explore the challenges presented by infrastructure PPPs, and contemplate what lies ahead as governments balance the need to provide innovative new infrastructure against the requirement for good public governance. This Handbook builds on a range of exciting theoretical lenses that span several disciplinary boundaries. It presents innovative insights and informed perspectives from an international base of empirical evidence.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Reviewing Public–Private Partnerships: Some Thoughts on Evaluation

Graeme A. Hodge


Graeme A. Hodge Introduction The performance of PPPs has seen wide debate. It has been characterized, though, as much by colourful and provocative rhetoric as by informed evidence-based observations. But given the breadth of available evaluation techniques, what awaits us if we want to properly assess PPPs? And what exactly do we mean by ‘evidence’ in evaluations? It is on these issues that this chapter offers some thoughts. It has already been noted that the PPP phenomenon covers a wealth of different meanings, including the taxonomy of five families1 noted in Chapter 1. One family, the long-term infrastructure contract (LTIC) category itself also encompasses a wide variety of arrangements aiming to provide infrastructure through legal contracts with consortia. Such public infrastructure PPPs have, throughout history, had multiple stakeholders, whether those associated with the project under way, or those with a common interest in the public decisions being made. Also, such PPPs these days directly involve a range of professional disciplines: from law and finance, through to accounting, economics and project management. Moreover, there are also several disciplines interested in these PPPs given that they are matters of public interest, including public policy, political science, regulation and governance. The implication of these observations is that any attempt at evaluating PPPs as an infrastructure delivery mechanism is likely to be subjected to the usual policy evaluation difficulties and language-games at the same time as incorporating inherently technical aspects. Such evaluation discussions are certainly not likely to be limited to one single disciplinary...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.