International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships
Show Less

International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships

Edited by Graeme A. Hodge, Carsten Greve and Anthony E. Boardman

In this timely Handbook, leading scholars from around the world explore the challenges presented by infrastructure PPPs, and contemplate what lies ahead as governments balance the need to provide innovative new infrastructure against the requirement for good public governance. This Handbook builds on a range of exciting theoretical lenses that span several disciplinary boundaries. It presents innovative insights and informed perspectives from an international base of empirical evidence.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Splintered Logic and Political Debate

Matthew Flinders


Matthew Flinders In 1983 the American political scientist Graham Allison wrote a seminal article in which he posed the question: are public and private organizations fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In asking this question Allison sought to explicate and define the differences between the values, principles and motivations – the very underlying logic – of public and private organizations. A quarter of a century later Allison’s question remains as salient, if not more so, than when it was first posed. More specifically, his conclusion that ‘public and private management are at least as different as they are similar, and the differences are more important than the similarities’ provides a canvas on which it is possible to explore emergent themes and tensions in relation to the role of public– private partnerships (PPPs) in the provision or supply of public goods in the twenty-first century. Exploring these themes, particularly those concerning sociopolitical relationships, is critical due to the fact that although a great deal has been written about the growth, role and technicalities of PPPs, very little has been written about the political implications of the global trend towards promoting a greater role for the private sector in the design and delivery of public services. More critically for the focus of this chapter, much of the literature on what might be termed ‘the politics of PPPs’ has exhibited a lazy style of thinking and little conscious theorizing – lazy in the sense that political debate has been couched in terms of broad polarizations that...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.