International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I
Show Less

International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I

General Issues and Regional Groups

Edited by Miroslav N. Jovanović

With this Handbook, Miroslav Jovanović has provided readers with both an excellent stand-alone original reference book as well as the first volume in a comprehensive three-volume set. This introduction into a rich and expanding academic and practical world of international economic integration also provides a theoretical and analytical framework to the reader, presenting select analytical studies and encouraging further research.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Contemporary Regionalism

Wilfred J. Ethier


Wilfred J. Ethier 1 INTRODUCTION Contemporary regionalism burst into being following twin late-1980s announcements, by the US and Canada of negotiations for a free trade area, and by the European Community (EC) of an attempt to complete its internal market. Well over 200 regional arrangements, involving most nations, now exist. The 1950s and 1960s had likewise witnessed many ‘old regionalism’ initiatives. Except for Western Europe, these in the end amounted to little, however, and efforts for preferential trade became relatively quiescent, until the dramatic advent of contemporary regionalism. The old regionalism stimulated two fundamental results in international trade theory.1 First, the Vinerian distinction between trade creation and trade diversion: a free trade area or customs union replaces one distortion with another distortion. Second, the Ohyama–Kemp–Wan proposition: any group of countries can always form a customs union in such a way that no country is made worse off. International trade theorists have responded to the new regional initiatives by investigating two questions. Will the formation of regional trading blocs raise or lower welfare? Will regionalism help or hinder multilateral trade liberalisation? Answers have been mixed.2 These investigations have adopted a Vinerian perspective augmented, in many cases, by a significant use of game theory (reflecting developments in economic thought since the days of the old regionalism). Less attention has been devoted to investigation of the more fundamental question of why contemporary regionalism has emerged – it has simply been treated as exogenous. Also absent has been appreciation of the fact that...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.