The Political Economy of Inter-Regional Fiscal Flows
Show Less

The Political Economy of Inter-Regional Fiscal Flows

Measurement, Determinants and Effects on Country Stability

Edited by Núria Bosch, Marta Espasa and Albert Solé Ollé

Struggles over what a region receives, or should receive, from the budget of the central government are common to many countries. Discussions often focus on the measures of ‘net fiscal flows’ or ‘fiscal balances’ provided by the government or other actors. This unique book shows just how these flows are computed then interpreted and clarifies the often misunderstood economic and political motives that explain why some regions receive more monies than others.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Comment V

Ramon Barberán


Ramon Barberán In Spain there is a strong tradition of researching on the calculation of federal fiscal balances (see Barberán, 2006). Moreover, the results of this research have a strong impact on the public. Both phenomena – tradition and impact – are explained by the current social debate on the inter-regional redistributive effects of the fiscal activity of the central government. This debate stems from the dissatisfaction felt by some regional governments and political parties with regard to the fiscal relationship between their region and central government. Consequently, the results of this type of research go beyond university level and are often used as an argument to support proposals for the reform of the regional government financing system or the regional distribution of central government investment. However, in my view, the relevance and reliability of such research is clearly exaggerated. The comparison between the results obtained from the large body of research conducted to date in Spain shows large discrepancies. These discrepancies are mainly caused by adopting different approaches and by applying different criteria in the allocation of central revenues and expenditures, even within the framework of the same approach. As stated in Barberán (2001), minor variations in the allocation criteria can cause major alterations in the federal fiscal balances. The most recent applied researches carried out in Spain (Uriel and Barberán, 2007; MEH, 2008; GTABFC, 2008) use two approaches: (1) the burden–benefit approach or benefit flow approach and (2) the cashflow approach or monetary flow approach....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.