Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth
Show Less

Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth

Edited by Philip Cooke, Bjørn Asheim, Ron Boschma, Ron Martin, Dafna Schwartz and Franz Tödtling

Today, economic growth is widely understood to be conditioned by productivity increases which are, in turn, profoundly affected by innovation. This volume explores these key relationships between innovation and growth, bringing together experts from both fields to compile a unique Handbook.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 40: Learning Regions

James Simmie


James Simmie INTRODUCTION ‘Learning regions’ are one of a family of concepts known as territorial innovation models (TIMs) that evolved from the late 1970s onwards. They were inspired by a growing debate about why localities still mattered in the context of the rapid internationalization of the global economy from around the 1960s. This was combined with a concern with shifts in standardized mass production manufacturing from what were seen as high-labour-cost areas in the First World to low cost areas in newly industrializing countries (NICs). In this context it was argued that the international competitiveness of local and regional economies in the First World increasingly rested on their relative abilities to adopt flexible, networked, knowledge-based and innovative production systems. Varying combinations of these characteristics were developed to explain either the continued competitive success of particular regions mostly in the US or Europe, or what policies were needed to insure the survival or renewal of less-favoured regions (LFRs). These included ‘new industrial districts’ in Italy (Bagnasco, 1977; Becattini, 1981), ‘innovative milieux’ in France (Aydalot, 1986), ‘new industrial spaces’ in the US (Storper and Scott, 1988), ‘spatial clusters of innovation’ (Porter, 1996) and ‘regional innovation systems’ in Europe (Braczyk et al., 1998). These theoretical developments were driven by three main debates. The first was the argument that the fusion of information and communications technologies was lessening the significance of geography, as information could be passed instantaneously from one part of the world to another as could many of the weightless products of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.