State and Local Fiscal Policy
Show Less

State and Local Fiscal Policy

Thinking Outside the Box?

Edited by Sally Wallace

In this broad and illuminating work, experts on public finance discuss innovations in state and local tax policy that have been implemented or considered over the course of the last three decades. The authors provide original work that analyzes whether state and local governments have ‘gone outside the box’ to deal with the strains of current public finances or have gotten along by adhering to the status quo. This book provides researchers, students and policy makers with evaluations and analyses by well-known scholars in the area of state and local public finance of actual practices and analysis of potential policy changes for the future.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: An Exploration of Various Corporate Tax Structures in Georgia: Some Effects of Moving from Three-Factor Apportionment of Corporate Income to a Gross Receipts Tax

Jonathan Rork and Laura Wheeler


Jonathan Rork and Laura Wheeler INTRODUCTION In 2004, the major tax on corporations in 40 of the 50 states of the USA was some form of a business tax. These taxes are often placed on corporate income as defined at the federal level with various modifications at the state level. Since 2002, however, four states have joined Washington in using some form of a gross receipts tax (GRT) as an alternative form of corporate taxation (Pogue, 2007). A GRT, often referred to as a turnover tax, is a tax placed on the value of goods and services sold. It makes no allowances for costs incurred by a firm and there are often no exemptions for type of sale. The GRT reached its heyday in the 1930s (Mikesell, 2007) and had seemed to fade away as a viable tax option. With the GRT’s recent reincarnation, discussions concerning the pros and cons of such a tax have become more frequent. Missing from these discussions, however, are any empirical exercises that can help shed light on these issues. By utilizing eight years of corporate tax return data in Georgia, we are able to estimate the winners and losers from switching to a GRT. In Georgia, all corporate filers who apportion their corporate earnings have to include their gross receipts; thus we have reliable estimates of gross receipts for over 200,000 filers during this time frame. By creating a revenue-neutral GRT, we are able to compare tax bills under Georgia’s corporate tax system...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.