Comparative Constitutional Law
Show Less

Comparative Constitutional Law

  • Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon

This landmark volume of specially commissioned, original contributions by top international scholars organizes the issues and controversies of the rich and rapidly maturing field of comparative constitutional law.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 11: A New Global Constitutional Order?

David Schneiderman

Extract

11. A new global constitutional order? David Schneiderman* Accompanying the rise of new transnational legal rules and institutions intended to promote global economic integration are questions about the linkages between transnational legality and constitutional law. In what ways does transnational economic law mimic features of national constitutional law? Does transnational law complement in some ways or supersede in other ways what we typically describe as constitutional law? To these questions we can now add the following: are transnational rules and institutions a proper subject of study for comparative constitutionalists? This chapter makes a case for the incorporation of forms of transnational legality into comparative constitutional studies.1 Taking as my focus the regime of international investment law, I argue that an appreciation of the constitutional functions of transnational legality deepens understandings of how constitutional law develops within, across and beyond national systems of law. More specifically, elements of transnational legality can help to explain the phenomenon of convergence and divergence in constitutional law. This expansion of the comparativist’s toolkit of resources, though challenging conventional understandings of constitutional law as grounded exclusively in states, better captures current developments. Comparative constitutionalists traditionally have been preoccupied with the identification of difference and similarity between families of national constitutional systems (see e.g. Finer 1979). Today, the dominant trend among comparative constitutionalists is to seek out not just differences and similarities but convergence. With a focus on judicial branches operating within national constitutional systems, proportionality review typically is singled out as evidence of an emerging worldwide...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.