Global Knowledge Work
Show Less

Global Knowledge Work

Diversity and Relational Perspectives

Edited by Katerina Nicolopoulou, Mine Karataş-Özkan, Ahu Tatli and John Taylor

Global Knowledge Work is an up-to-date account of theoretical approaches and empirical research in the multi-disciplinary topic of global knowledge workers from a relational and diversity perspective. It includes contributions from international scholars and practitioners who have been working with the concept of global knowledge workers from a number of different perspectives, including personal and academic life trajectories. They reveal that the relational framework of the three dimensions of analysis (macro-meso-micro) is relevant for analyzing the phenomenon of global knowledge workers, as expertise and specialised knowledge and its innovative application, together with the attraction and retention of talent remain key topics in the current socioeconomic conditions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 13: Autonomy as a Stressor in Knowledge Work

Peter Holdt Christensen


Peter Holdt Christensen INTRODUCTION In recent decades the knowledge worker has emerged as the key to organizational competitive advantage (Davenport 2005; Dixon 2000) in an ever flatter and more globalized world where organizational life has to both fight global competitors, and seize global opportunities. The knowledge worker is a key organizational resource in creating and sustaining competitive advantages in this dynamic and innovative context. Knowledge workers possess valuable knowledge and are capable of creating new knowledge contributing to new organizational processes, products and services (Leonard-Barton 1995). So, knowledge workers have both outdated and outperformed manual work. Furthermore, knowledge workers seem to be almost automatically motivated – just remember to allow them high levels of autonomy. At least, this seems to be the dominant way of thinking within management theory. In the same vein, work environment theories – most notably the demand/control model (Karasek 1979) – argue that high decision latitudes combined with high psychological demands predict active jobs, or what may also be referred to as knowledge work. Increasingly, however, knowledge workers suffer from occupational stress that normally is expected to arise from jobs termed high strain jobs (Burke and Fiksenbaum 2008: 9). So, how do we account for knowledge worker’s increased levels of occupational stress at the same time that knowledge work is most often labelled an active job that comes with high levels of autonomy, and therefore is supposed to predict high levels of motivation? Contrary to conventional managerial wisdom I argue that knowledge work is not at all an active...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.