Does Decentralization Enhance Service Delivery and Poverty Reduction?
Show Less

Does Decentralization Enhance Service Delivery and Poverty Reduction?

Edited by Ehtisham Ahmad and Giorgio Brosio

Does decentralization enhance service delivery and poverty reduction? Drawing on cutting edge research, expert contributors address this fundamental question facing policy-makers in developing as well as advanced countries. This timely book builds upon insights on the recent developments in the intergovernmental literature first outlined in the Handbook of Fiscal Federalism. New empirical evidence from across the globe is presented: policy-oriented chapters evaluate fiscal federalism with an emphasis on the effectiveness of decentralized service delivery, the decentralization process in different parts of the world is appraised, and specially commissioned research focuses on the political economy process and the outcomes of the decentralization process. The role of international agencies, as explicit donors, is examined in several chapters.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: Fiscal Policy Instruments and the Political Economy of Designing Programs to Reach the Poorest

Ehtisham Ahmad


Ehtisham Ahmad* 1 THE CONTEXT Reaching the poorest and hungry groups of the population, including those who might be left out of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) involves policy-makers at the central and local levels of government. While there has been considerable focus on appropriate targeting mechanisms to reach the poor (see for example, World Bank, 1990; Besley and Kanbur, 1993), attention as to which level of government should be involved, as well as the interactions between levels of government in reaching the poor, is more recent (see Bardhan and Mookherjee, 2000; von Braun and Grote, 2002 and a survey by Birner, 2007). From the policy perspective, it is important to examine the instruments available at each level of government in order to meet the needs of the poorest. If the responsibility for these groups is seen primarily as that of the central government, then direct federal/central government programs, effectively targeted but building on local information come into focus. If the primary responsibility is local, the policy focus shifts to own-source revenues for financing the expenditures and for greater local accountability, together with a modicum of equalization transfers so that all local governments have similar capacities to provide for the poorest. Designing central programs to reach the poorest may be difficult without local information. This is because the central government, particularly in large countries such as Mexico and China, lacks the ability to precisely define marginal groups or households that may not benefit from more general growth and prosperity. Yet...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.